Cookie policy: This site uses cookies (small files stored on your computer) to simplify and improve your experience of this website. Cookies are small text files stored on the device you are using to access this website. For more information please take a look at our terms and conditions. Some parts of the site may not work properly if you choose not to accept cookies.


Subscribe or Register

Existing user? Login

Chief pharmaceutical officer of England ought to be congratulated

From Graham Phillips’s letter about his attendance at the ‘Quality for patients: pharmacy practice now and in the future’ conference (The Pharmaceutical Journal 2017;298:234), I thought he was going to report on the conference but all he offered was a rant at the chief pharmaceutical officer (CPO) for England for, in his view, inadequate praise of community pharmacy.

The CPO for England is well able to defend himself and I note The Pharmaceutical Journal offered Keith Ridge the opportunity but civil servants rightly avoid public professional spats and are limited in what they can and cannot say publicly, particularly at general election time.

It is easy to offer criticism but this should be professional, constructive and courteous, particularly in such challenging and turbulent times. Disappointingly, Phillips failed to offer any evidence of widespread successes in community pharmacy that sit well with the title of this conference, only criticism of (and some rudeness towards) the CPO. I was under the impression that unprofessional behaviour towards or about a colleague was at best frowned upon by our profession. Phillips’s letter certainly skirts with this.

I would draw readers attention to another letter published recently (The Pharmaceutical Journal online, 11 April 2017). This talks of collaboration to achieve cross sector success and highlights the achievement of the CPO in raising the profile of the medicines agenda in NHS England’s ‘Five year forward view’ (the same applies to a number of other NHS England and Department of Health documents).

No one should underestimate the difficulty in getting such profile in government documents against many competing NHS priorities and we should celebrate the resulting opportunity for pharmacy. The scale of pharmacist posts announced for employment in GP surgeries is such an example and is as much a wake up to our profession to get involved in clinical activity as it was to the GP community and public of the role our profession can offer.

The CPO should therefore be congratulated for his successes in the current hostile NHS financial climate and we should be looking forward not backwards. We as members of our profession should be seizing and exploiting the opportunities before us and be shouting about them, not involving ourselves in backstabbing our professional leaders who have fought and succeeded in getting these opportunities for us. Time to be more professional and collaborative I think.

Ron G Pate


West Midlands


Citation: The Pharmaceutical Journal DOI: 10.1211/PJ.2017.20202769

Readers' comments (2)

  • So... where to start!

    Reading Mr Phillips' letter, I in no way feel any professional boundaries have been broken and I see no personal insults or unfair accusations made. Mr Phillips is simply pointing out what happened at the conference.

    As a professional, you should be prepared to explain your reasoning and the thought process you used to come to your conclusions. I feel this is the very least Dr Ridge can do, if for no other reason than to explain to the some three quarters of the profession that he seems to feel are superfluous.

    If Dr Ridge is able to defend himself, why has he not done so? This is much more than a "professional spat" and I find it really quite pathetic that this is being used as a reason for the CPhO to avoid defending and/or justifying the actions of the government, which he seems to back, let alone entering a discussion with the profession. What the government plan to do threatens the very viability of the NHS!

    Celebrate the resulting opportunity for Community Pharmacy? You mean the opportunity for the ones that may survive the cull that Dr Ridge seems to advocate? And for those fortunate to survive the blunt and reckless cuts, would those opportunities involve the sales of sandwiches and shampoo?

    I look forward to your response, sir.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The silence is deafening...

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

For commenting, please login or register as a user and agree to our Community Guidelines. You will be re-directed back to this page where you will have the ability to comment.

Recommended from Pharmaceutical Press

Search an extensive range of the world’s most trusted resources

Powered by MedicinesComplete
  • Print
  • Share
  • Comment
  • Save
  • Print Friendly Version of this pagePrint Get a PDF version of this webpagePDF

Newsletter Sign-up

Want to keep up with the latest news, comment and CPD articles in pharmacy and science? Subscribe to our free alerts.