The risk of developing prostate cancer increases with age after 50 years, although risk increases after the age of 40 years in patients who have a first-degree relative with a history of prostate cancer. This approximately doubles the lifetime risk of developing prostate cancer; this risk is higher for men who have a brother with a history of prostate cancer than for those who have an affected father.
Early stage prostate cancer is generally asymptomatic, as many prostate cancers start in the posterior peripheral zone (the outer part of the prostate away from the urethra). It is not until the tumour has grown large enough to put pressure on the urethra that symptoms are noticeable. Locally advanced prostate cancer will most commonly cause bladder outlet obstruction, with a small proportion of patients experiencing haematuria, urinary tract infections, irritation on passing urine or erectile dysfunction. Many of the symptoms of prostate cancer are also present in benign prostatic hyperplasia.
In the UK, patients presenting to their GP with symptoms that suggest prostate cancer (e.g. lower urinary tract symptoms, such as nocturia, urinary frequency, hesitancy, urgency or retention or erectile dysfunction or visible haematuria) are given a digital rectal examination and prostate specific antigen blood test.
e cancer is the second most common cancer in men worldwide
and the most commonly diagnosed cancer in men in the UK
. In the UK, a total of 41,700 men were diagnosed with prostate cancer in 2011 and there were a total of 10,800 deaths from metastatic prostate cancer in 2012
. These figures equate to 110 new cases and 30 deaths every day. Risk of developing the disease increases with age, with more th
an a third of prostate cancers diagnosed in men aged over 75 years
There is a lack of international consensus for the detection, diagnosis and management of prostate cancer, with the disease currently managed differently in the UK and United States. This article focuses on providing an overview of prostate cancer, including early detection and prevention, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing, diagnosis and staging.
Age is the most important risk factor for developing prostate cancer, with the risk generally increasing with age after 50 years, although the risk increases after the age of 40 years in patients with a first-degree relative with a history of prostate cancer
. This approximately doubles the lifetime risk of developing prostate cancer; this risk is higher for men who have a brother with a history of prostate cancer than for those who have an affected father. Unlike other cancers, where increased understanding of the molecular biology of the disease at a cellular level has led to identification of risk factors, there are currently no common specific gene mutations that are associated with prostate cancer risk as the full range of prostate cancer genomic alterations are incompletely characterised
Ethnicity is a significant risk factor in prostate cancer, although the reason for racial variability is currently unknown. The highest incidence of prostate cancer worldwide is found in American black men, who have around a 9.8% lifetime risk of developing prostate cancer; 1.6 times that of white men
. In the UK, black men also have a substantially greater risk of developing prostate cancer compared with white men. although this risk is lower than that of American black men
. Japanese and Chinese men have the lowest rates of prostate cancer
. Socioeconomic status appears to be unrelated to the risk of prostate cancer
Dietary factors were thought to play a part in prostate cancer risk, with high levels of dietary fat associated with an increased risk and cruciferous vegetables (e.g. broccoli) associated with a reduced risk. However, no study to date has proven that diet and nutrition are either causative or preventative factors for the development of prostate cancer.
Vasectomy may increase the relative risk of prostate cancer, according to data from several large epidemiologic studies; however, these studies did not report an increased risk of dying from prostate cancer associated with vasectomy, so any link remains unproven
Regular ejaculation may reduce prostate cancer risk. A large prospective study of more than 29,000 men demonstrated an association between high ejaculatory frequency (more than 21 ejaculations/month) and a decreased risk of prostate cancer, with a lifetime relative risk of 0.67, compared with men who reported a lower ejaculatory frequency
. The reliability of this study had previously been questioned because of its short follow-up, however, more recent follow-up data confirm the original findings and have provided the firmest evidence to date that men can decrease their risk of prostate cancer by ejaculating frequently
. The Health Professionals Follow-up Study followed nearly 32,000 healthy men for 18 years, 3,839 of whom were later diagnosed with prostate cancer. All participating men were asked to report their average monthly frequency of ejaculation from the ages of 20–29 years, 40–49 years and for the previous year, which allowed calculation of a lifetime average. After potential confounders were controlled for, the risk of prostate cancer was 20% lower in men who ejaculated at least 21 times a month than in men who ejaculated between four and seven times a month (P<0.0001)
Symptoms of prostate cancer
As men age, their prostate gland often enlarges, most commonly caused by benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). The exact cause of BPH is unknown, but it is likely to be a normal part of the ageing process in men, caused by changes in hormone balance and cell growth. There is no definite link between BPH and prostate cancer, as BPH does not usually develop into cancer and men can develop prostate cancer without having first experienced BPH. However, an enlarged prostate may sometimes contain areas of cancer cells, and men with BPH can develop prostate cancer. BPH commonly manifests as problems passing urine (more frequently, difficulty in passing and passing at night).
Early stage prostate cancer is generally asymptomatic, as many prostate cancers start in the posterior peripheral zone (the outer part of the prostate away from the urethra). It is not until the tumour has grown large enough to put pressure on the urethra that symptoms are noticeable. Locally advanced prostate cancer will most commonly cause bladder outlet obstruction, with a small proportion of patients experiencing haematuria, urinary tract infections, irritation on passing urine or erectile dysfunction. Many of the symptoms of prostate cancer are also present in BPH, and there is a lack of symptoms to aid early detection and diagnosis.
Prostate cancer is usually slow growing and can be present for a number of years before it is detected. Men with advanced disease can present with bone pain from bony metastases and occasionally bilateral lower leg oedema from bulky lymph node metastases.
The UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has issued guidance on diagnosis of prostate cancer
. Patients presenting to their GP with symptoms that suggest prostate cancer (e.g. nocturia, urinary frequency, hesitancy, urgency, retention, erectile dysfunction or visible haematuria) are given a digital rectal examination (DRE) and prostate specific antigen (PSA) blood test
Urinary tract infections should be ruled out prior to performing a PSA test. Patients who have had a urine infection should not undergo a PSA test for at least a month after treatment finishes
There is no single PSA level that is considered ‘normal’ as it varies from man to man and the normal level increases with age. As a guide:
- 3ng/mL or less is normal for a man aged under 60 years;
- 4ng/mL or less is normal for a man aged 60–69 years;
- 5ng/mL or less is normal for a man aged over 70 years.
A reading higher than 10ng/mL can be an indication of a non-cancerous (benign) enlargement of the prostate gland. However, the higher the level of PSA, the more likely it is that the patient has prostate cancer
If the PSA test result is outside the age-specific reference range and a hard, irregular prostate is felt on DRE, the patient should be referred to a hospital urologist urgently and should be seen within two weeks. If the PSA test result is borderline normal and there is doubt about whether to refer, a second PSA test should be performed after an interval of six to eight weeks. If the second test indicates that the PSA level is rising, the patient should be referred urgently
. Patients with lower urinary tract symptoms with high PSA levels should be referred urgently.
In most cases, a positive test will lead to a biopsy, which often does not give a definitive diagnosis and may cause complications (see ‘Prostate cancer screening’). Biopsy is usually performed using transrectal ultrasonographic guidance under local anaesthesia and causes infection in one in every 200 cases
. Haematuria is common for two to three days following the biopsy, as well as haematospermia for up to four to six weeks. If the biopsy result is negative, then patients are usually followed up with active surveillance.
Prostate cancer screening
The benefits of PSA-based prostate cancer screening in detection has been evaluated in randomised controlled trials
, and a meta-analysis of the data suggested that the efficacy of screening, with the goal of reducing prostate cancer mortality, has too limited evidence to draw conclusions
The European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) study provided some of the strongest evidence of the benefit, showing that for every 1,055 men screened, one additional death from prostate cancer could be prevented. However, this benefit was at the cost of considerable overtreatment
. Research indicates that for every 100,000 men aged 50 years offered screening, 748 would end up being treated. Men accepting screening would have their lives extended on average by one day, while 274 men would be made impotent, 25 incontinent and 17 would have rectal problems as a result of the treatment
In the United States, screening is targeted at men aged 55–69 years and involves shared decision-making, weighing the benefits of preventing prostate cancer mortality (e.g. prevent one death for every 1,000 men screened over a decade), against the known potential harms associated with screening and treatment
Men in the United States who want to be screened receive a PSA test. DRE is usually performed as part of screening. If prostate cancer is not found in screening, the time between future screenings depends on the results of the PSA blood test:
- Men who choose to be tested who have a PSA of less than 2.5ng/mL may only need to be retested every two years;
- Screening should be conducted yearly for men whose PSA level is 2.5ng/mL or higher.
In the UK, the National Screening Committee does not recommend universal screening of men for prostate cancer because the PSA test is not effective enough and does not identify a large proportion of prostate cancer cases
Prostate cancer staging can be complex because various staging, grading and classification systems are used either alone or in combination. It is most usefully described as one of three stages:
- locally advanced
More detailed staging of prostate cancer is undertaken by evaluating the size and location of the tumour, regional lymph node involvement and presence of distant metastases, using the TNM system (see ‘TNM staging for prostate cancer’)
. The tumour grade is determined by assessing the extent of tumour cell differentiation. Staging and grading of the prostate cancer are essential to determining optimal treatment and prognosis. Ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT) scans and bone scans are all used at this stage to determine the extent of the tumour.
TNM staging for prostate cancer
lly advanced disease will, over time, progress to metastatic disease. Patients will also frequently present with distant bone metastases. Prognosis for advanced metastatic disease is poor, with 30% of men surviving for five years after diagnosis
. Localised prostate cancer, in comparison, has a much better five-year survival rate of 90%. This figure drops to 70–80% for locally advanced prostate cancer, but still remain
s higher than for metastatic disease
Gleason grading system
The majority of prostate cancers are adenocarcinomas. The Gleason grading system is used to provide the pathological prognostic information based on the microscopic appearance of the cancer cells in addition to clinical stage
(see ‘Gleason grading system’). The pathologist will rate the two most common (primary and secondary) tumour patterns seen under the microscope and score each on a scale of 1 to 5. The two scores are combined to give the final Gleason score.
Treatment options and staging investigations for men with potentially localised prostate cancer are determined by patients’ D’Amico risk classification and provisional treatment intent (radical or non-radical).
The D’Amico risk classification system uses PSA, Gleason score and T stage (size of the tumour on DRE or ultrasound) to group men into low, intermediate or high risk groups.â€¨â€¨
- Low-risk: PSA of less than or equal to 10ng/mL, Gleason score of less than or equal to 6, and clinical stage T1-2aâ€¨;
- Intermediate risk: PSA of between 10ng/mL and 20ng/mL, Gleason score of 7, or clinical stage T2bâ€¨;
- High-risk: PSA of more than 20ng/mL, Gleason score of equal to or larger than 8, or clinical stage T2c-3a;
The treatment strategy for a patient with prostate cancer also considers other prognostic factors, such as age, comorbidities and wishes of the patient
While traditional staging is still the mainstay of treatment decision making, biomarkers are being investigated that can provide both prognostic and predictive information. There are a number of biomarkers in development and early use in the United States, such as Oncotype DX, which is used in the diagnosis of breast cancer in the UK. However, these markers are still not accepted into routine practice
Steve Williamson, MRPharmS (IPresc), MSc Onc, is a Consultant Cancer Pharmacist at Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust and NHS England.
 Ferlay J, Steliarova-Foucher E, Lortet-Tieulent J et al. Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: estimates for 40 countries in 2012. Eur J Cancer 2013;49:1374–1403.
 Cancer research UK. Prostate cancer statistics. Available at: http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/statistics-by-cancer-type/prostate-cancer#heading-One (accessed June 2015).
 Moul JW, Armstrong A & Lattanzi J. Prostate Cancer. In: Cancer Management: A Multidisciplinary Approach Medical, Surgical, & Radiation Oncology. Available at: http://www.cancernetwork.com/cancer-management (accessed 2015).
 Berger MF, Lawrence MS, Demichelis F et al. The genomic complexity of primary human prostate cancer. Nature 2011;470:214–220.
 Ben-Shlomo Y, Evans S, Ibrahim F et al. The risk of prostate cancer amongst black men in the United Kingdom: the PROCESS cohort study. Eur Urol. 2008;53(1):99–105.
 Leitzmann MF, Platz EA, Stampfer MJ et al. Ejaculation Frequency and Subsequent Risk of Prostate Cancer. JAMA 2004;291:1578–1586.
 American Urological Association (AUA) 2015 Annual Meeting: Abstract PD6-07. Presented 15 May 2015.
 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Guidelines. Prostate cancer: diagnosis and treatment [CG175] Available at: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg175/resources/guidance-prostate-cancer-diagnosis-and-treatment-pdf (accessed June 2015).
 Cancer Research UK. Prostate cancer tests. Available at: http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/about-cancer/type/prostate-cancer/diagnosis/prostate-cancer-tests (accessed June 2015).
 Hugosson J, Carlsson S, Aus G et al. Mortality results from the Goteborg randomised population-based prostate-cancer screening trial. Lancet Oncology 2010;11:725.
 Ilic D, O’Connor D, Green S et al. Screening for prostate cancer: an updated Cochrane systematic review. BJU Int 2011;107:882.
 SchrÃ¶der FH, Hugosson J, Roobol MJ et al; ERSPC Investigators. Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study. N Engl J Med 2009;360(13):1320–1328.
 American Urological Association (AUA) Guideline — Early Detection Of Prostate Cancer: April 2013. Available at: https://www.auanet.org/common/pdf/education/clinical-guidance/Prostate-Cancer-Detection.pdf (accessed June 2015).
 Edge S, Byrd DR, Compton CC et al. American Joint Committee on Cancer. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 7th ed. New York: Springer, 2010.
 Gleason DF. Classification of prostatic carcinomas. Cancer Chemother Rep 1966;50:125–128.
 D’Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB et al. Pretreatment nomogram for prostate-specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy or external-beam radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 1999;17(1):168–172.
 Crawford ED, Ventii K & Shore ND. New biomarkers in prostate cancer. Oncology 2014;28(2):135–142.