Palliative care: end-of-life medicines management

Caring for patients who are at the end of life requires a holistic approach. The selection and monitoring of medicines to control common end-of-life symptoms are areas where pharmacists can contribute.

This content was published in 2012. We do not recommend that you take any clinical decisions based on this information without first ensuring you have checked the latest guidance.

Summary

Medicines management in the dying patient is an important part of the overall approach to end-of-life care. Drug regimens are simplified to include only essential medicines and the delivery of medicines to the patient should be via the least invasive route — preventing undue pain or distress for the patient.

Medicines can be used for patients to control pain, prevent nausea and vomiting, reduce agitation and restlessness, and to control other diseasespecific symptoms that are commonly experienced at the end of life.

Recognising when a patient is soon to die can be complex. In the final days of life the patient will almost certainly be physically wasted and weak. He or she is likely to be bedbound, becoming increasingly drowsy and disorientated with a limited attention span.1 This article discusses the control of various symptoms that occur at the end of life and common medicines management issues that arise.

Stopping medicines

Drugs that offer long-term survival benefits are of little advantage to someone with a prognosis of months or weeks and these medicines should be reviewed regularly. When a patient enters the final days of life all unnecessary medicines should be stopped and only essential medicines (eg, analgesics, antiemetics, anxiolytics and anticonvulsants) continued.

Delivery of medicines

Dysphagia usually occurs and swallowing tablets can become a problem with little food and drink intake.2,3 Continuous subcutaneous infusion (CSCI) via a syringe driver is a common method of drug delivery at the end of life. This route is preferred because it is: 

  • Less invasive than intravenous administration
  • Less painful and more predictable than intramuscular administration
  • Quicker than transdermal administration to titrate drug doses

A syringe driver is a small portable infusion device that delivers medicine at a set rate. Older devices, such as the Graseby pump, deliver medicine at rates set in millimetres per unit time, and require a manual calculation to determine the correct rate of administration for the dose prescribed. Newer devices calculate the rate in terms of millilitres per unit time and do not require this calculation — reducing the risk of errors.

In 2010 the National Patient Safety Agency4 recommended the use of newer millilitre-based devices (such as the McKinley T3) over older devices.

Mixing two or more medicines in a syringe driver is commonplace in palliative care because patients will often need treatment for more than one symptom. However, certain drugs may be incompatible and cause problems when mixed. There are reference sources available that provide information on the compatibility of drug combinations, eg, the Syringe Driver Survey Database.

Symptom control

Although it can be difficult to predict how and when a patient’s condition will deteriorate, there are common symptoms that can worsen in the last few days of life (eg, pain, nausea, agitation and bronchial secretions)

Anticipatory prescribing of medicines ensures that, should these symptoms develop, treatments are available for administration without delay wherever the patient is being cared for.

Common symptoms experienced in the dying phase are described below and various disease-specific considerations are summarised in Box 1.

Box 1: Disease-specific considerations

Pain

Parenteral administration of a strong opioid, such as diamorphine or morphine, is routinely used for pain control at the end of life. Administration by CSCI allows the patient continuous pain relief. Additional subcutaneous doses can be prescribed for breakthrough pain, usually one sixth of the total 24-hour dose, and can be given as frequently as needed. The CSCI dose should be reviewed, and the dose titrated if necessary, on a daily basis.

Transdermal patches containing fentanyl or buprenorphine should be continued for patients who are established on them if there is insufficient time to change them to a new regimen. Appropriate breakthrough pain relief should also be prescribed in the form of a subcutaneous injection of a strong opioid. Some patients using transdermal patches may need additional analgesia by CSCI, yet some GPs and district nurses may be reluctant to use two different methods of administering a strong opioid to one patient despite it being a safe and fast way to achieve adequate pain control. The required dose should be equivalent to the total amount of additional breakthrough pain relief the patient needed over the previous 24 hours to control his or her pain. A new breakthrough pain relief dose will therefore need to be determined and the intended continued use of the patch should be documented.

If the decision is made to remove the patch and continue the patient on a strong opioid alone via CSCI, the time it takes for blood concentrations of the drug to decline following removal of the patch should be considered (see Box 2).

Box 2: Transdermal opioid preparations

Nausea and vomiting

Various factors influence the choice of antiemetic for the dying patient and considerations to determine the best approach include: 

  • The cause of the nausea and whether it is preventable
  • The available route of administration
  • Which antiemetics have worked previously
  • Identification of side effects that need to be avoided

Cyclizine (150mg/24h by CSCI or 50mg when required up to three times a day) and haloperidol (5–10mg/24h by CSCI) can be used to control nausea and vomiting. Levomepromazine (6.25–25mg/24h by CSCI or 6.25–12.5mg when required) is a useful option for refractory nausea and vomiting. Prokinetic drugs can be useful for patients with gastric stasis.

Restlessness and agitation

Certain factors may precipitate restlessness and agitation in dying patients (eg, pain, anxiety, urinary retention)6 and efforts should be made to prevent these. If agitation is still present, or no clear cause can be identified, it may be appropriate to sedate the patient.

Midazolam, can be given by CSCI (5–30mg/24h) or when required (2.5–5mg), titrating the dose to response. Some patients may need higher doses;9 however, this increases the risk of disinhibition and paradoxical agitation.

Other medicines that are commonly used include haloperidol (2.5–10mg/24h by CSCI or 1.5–2.5mg when required) and levomepromazine (12.5–75mg/24h by CSCI or 6.25–12.5mg when required).5 Both of these medicines can be useful when nausea and vomiting are also present.

Respiratory tract secretions

In the last days of life progressive muscle weakness can prevent patients from coughing or swallowing effectively. An inability to clear secretions in the upper respiratory tract causes noisy or bubbly breathing.

Although it is common clinical practice to treat this symptom, the evidence to support doing so is lacking. Hyoscine butylbromide can be given subcutaneously as required (20mg) or by CSCI (60–120mg/24h).5 Hyoscine hydrobromide (400μg as a single dose or 1.2–2.4mg/24h by CSCI)5 can also be used but is more sedating than hyoscine butylbromide. Glycopyrronium bromide is another alternative although it is sometimes difficult to obtain.

References

  1. Twycross R, Wilcock A, Stark C. Symptom management in advanced cancer. Fourth Edition. Abingdon: Radcliffe Medical; 2001.
  2. Ellershaw J, Sutcliffe J, Saunders C. Dehydration and the dying patient. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 1995;10:192–7.
  3. Higgs R. The diagnosis of dying. Journal of Royal College of Physicians of London 1999;33:110–2.
  4. National Patient Safety Agency. Safer ambulatory syringe drivers. December 2010. www.nrls.npsa.nhs.uk/resources/type/ alerts/?entryid45=92908 (accessed 1 November 2012).
  5. Twycross R, Wilcock A (eds). Palliative Care Formulary. Fourth Edition (online). www.palliativedrugs.com (accessed 1 November 2012).
  6. Watson M, Lucas C, Hoy A, et al. Oxford Handbook of Palliative Care. Second Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006.
  7. Prommer E. Management of bleeding in the terminally ill patient. Haematology 2005;10:167–75.
  8. Perira J, Phan T. Management of bleeding in patients with advanced cancer. Oncologist 2004;9:561–70.
  9. Department of Health Renal National Service Framework Team and Marie Curie Palliative Care Institute. Guidelines for LCP prescribing in advanced chronic kidney disease. May 2008. www.dh.gov.uk (accessed 1 November 2012).
Last updated
Citation
Clinical Pharmacist, CP, 2012;()::DOI:10.1211/PJ.2021.1.86762